HERMENETIC AND LAW: NEW PATHWAYS
Abstract
The Constitution of 1988 represents a change of paradigm in the Brazilian law. From this change of model, it is necessary to investigate the performance of duty, from the protection of the dignity of the person. The Right aligned the philosophical hermeneutics is therefore a bias processor. Hence the need to understand the law from being-in-the-world (In-der-Welt-Sein). The legal thought can not be designed from a predominantly caused by the limits of reason and built with the power of abstract rationality. It is in this sense that, given the striking ineffectiveness of classical hermeneutics, methodological in your origin, it is necessary to construct a theoretical strength that point to the construction of the conditions of possibility of understanding the law, as a way of being-in-the-world.
Downloads
References
______. Ser e Tempo: parte I. Trad. Márcia Sá Cavalcante Schuback. 12.ed. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2002, p.33.
MELLO, Cleyson de Moraes. Hermenêutica e Direito. Rio de Janeiro: Freitas Bastos, 2006.
______. Código Civil Interpretado. Rio de Janeiro: Freitas Bastos, 2007.
STEIN, Ernildo. Nas proximidades da Antropologia: ensaios e conferências filosóficas. Ijuí: Unijuí, 2003, p.16.
TEPEDINO, Gustavo. Crise de Fontes Normativas e Técnica Legislativa na parte geral do Código Civil de 2002. In: TEPEDINO, Gustavo. (Org.). A parte geral do novo Código Civil: estudos na Perspectiva Constitucional. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 2002.
VATTIMO, Gianni. O fim da Modernidade: Niilismo e Hermenêutica na Cultura Pós-Moderna. Trad. Maria de Fátima Boavida. Lisboa: Presença, 1987.
VAZ, Henrique Cláudio Lima. Antropologia Filosófica II. 4.ed. São Paulo: Loyola, 2003.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which allows sharing the work with recognition of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
The author declares to be responsible for the originality, uniqueness and currency of the article content, by means of complete references to all consulted sources.
Each author grants to the LexCult Journal permission to evaluate, normalize, edit and publish the submitted article, in an unprecedented way.
Plagiarism cases and self plagiarism will not be accepted under no circumstances. The plagiarist will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years.
The copy, in full or to some extent, of an article published in LexCult Journal will be allowed as long as the source (author and Journal) is informed, being forbidden the commercial use and the production and distribution of derivative works. In case the exclusivity clause is broken, the submission will be filed and the author will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years, without bringing any civil actions provided by national law.
The author is aware that:
a) Submissions may be rejected if the journal's Editorial Board, responsible for evaluation and article selection, does not consider it pertinent for publication, whatever may be the well-justified reasons;
b) Editors reserve the right to modify the submitted manuscript - without any content alteration - in view of its normalization and adaptation to the publication norms.
