ANALYSIS OF THE PERFORMANCE OF BRAZILIAN EDUCATION BASED ON OFFICIAL PISA AND IDEB INDICATORS
Abstract
Pisa is a performance indicator of international basic education that the learning of students from several countries. Ideb is a national school performance indicator, applied by INEP. Through Ideb, it is possible to measure whether the goals of the National Education Plan (PNE) are being achieved, as their results serve as a basis for planning and projecting new goals. The aim of this study was to compare the goals projected by the PNE with the results of Pisa and Ideb, with the purpose of
understanding the current situation in which basic education is found in Brazil. The study used bibliographic and documentary research and descriptive data analysis as methodology. Initially, the study addressed the characteristics of Brazil that influence education, such as historical factors, population size, illiteracy rate, economy and inequality in income distribution. The analysis period included the results of the Ideb from 2007 to 2017 and the results of the Pisa 2015 and 2018. The study revealed that Brazil has made progress in the universalization of teaching and positive results in early childhood education. However, the final years of primary and secondary education have shown low educational levels in Pisa and Ideb and have not achieved the projected goals. The PNE has the challenge of developing actions that promote an inclusive and equitable education, considering the inequalities in education, which are historical in the country.
Downloads

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which allows sharing the work with recognition of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
The author declares to be responsible for the originality, uniqueness and currency of the article content, by means of complete references to all consulted sources.
Each author grants to the LexCult Journal permission to evaluate, normalize, edit and publish the submitted article, in an unprecedented way.
Plagiarism cases and self plagiarism will not be accepted under no circumstances. The plagiarist will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years.
The copy, in full or to some extent, of an article published in LexCult Journal will be allowed as long as the source (author and Journal) is informed, being forbidden the commercial use and the production and distribution of derivative works. In case the exclusivity clause is broken, the submission will be filed and the author will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years, without bringing any civil actions provided by national law.
The author is aware that:
a) Submissions may be rejected if the journal's Editorial Board, responsible for evaluation and article selection, does not consider it pertinent for publication, whatever may be the well-justified reasons;
b) Editors reserve the right to modify the submitted manuscript - without any content alteration - in view of its normalization and adaptation to the publication norms.