THE INVENTION OF SANTOS DUMONT'S PERSONAL FILE
Abstract
This paper aims to discuss how the constitution of what is known today as the Santos Dumont Personal Archive took place. This set of documents was donated to the Aeronautics Documentation Center (CENDOC), Military Organization (OM) of the Aeronautics Command (COMAER), in 2004 and consists of 2716 documentary units, 764 iconographic documents and 1.57 linear meters of textual documents, gathered by the father of Aviation until 1932, in addition to the additions selected by Brigadier Lavenère-Wanderley in the 1960s. This documentary set, although not the result of the functions and activities developed by Dumont, is representative of his trajectory from a perspective. personal, since this set was accumulated from clippings now requested by Santos Dumont. At the content level, documents reflect your activities. This set has, therefore, the power of documentary representation about the life of Santos Dumont and presents documents coming from Santos Dumont's action of aggregating records about his life. The research was based on problematizing the process of constitution of the documentary set that today is considered the personal archive of Santos Dumont. In this sense, we sought, through dialogues with the archival theory, to describe the archival history of the collection, in order to compare the process of producing this archive with that of a personal archive. It is hoped, with this work, to demonstrate that, although we can not consider it, in the canonical sense of the definition, a personal archive, this is the personal archive of Santos Dumont, based on the archival history presented.
Downloads
References
ARQUIVO NACIONAL (Brasil). Dicionário brasileiro de terminologia arquivística. Rio de Janeiro: Arquivo Nacional, 2005.
ASSIS, Ailton. Um lampião dentro da mala: o arquivo pessoal de Octávio Pacheco, memória e autobiografia. 2009. 264 p. Dissertação (Mestrado em Letras) – Universidade Federal de São João Del Rei, Minas Gerais, 2009.
BELLOTTO, Heloísa Liberalli. Arquivos permanentes: tratamento documental. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: FGV, 2004.
BELLOTTO, Heloísa Liberalli. Arquivos permanentes: tratamento documental. 4. ed. Rio de Janeiro: FGV, 2006.
BRASIL. Lei no 8.159, de 8 de janeiro de 1991. Dispõe sobre a política nacional de arquivos públicos e privados e dá outras providências. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República, 1991. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/LEIS/L8159.htm. Acesso em: 14 fev. 2015.
CASANOVA, Eugenio. Archivistica. 2. ed. Siena: Lazzeri, 1928.
DEMO, Pedro. Educar pela pesquisa. Campinas: Autores Associados, 1996.
GIL, Antônio Carlos. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 4. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2002.
HEYMANN, Luciana Quillet. Indivíduo, memória e resíduo histórico: uma reflexão sobre arquivos pessoais e o caso Filinto Müller. Revista Estudos Históricos, Rio de Janeiro, v. 10, n. 19, p. 41-66, 1997.
HEYMANN, Luciana Quillet. O indivíduo fora do lugar. Revista do Arquivo Público Mineiro, Belo Horizonte, v. 45, n. 2, p. 40-57, jul./dez. 2009.
LOPEZ, André Porto Ancona. Tipologia documental de partidos e associações políticas brasileiras. São Paulo: USP, 1999.
MILLAR, Laura Agnes. A morte dos fundos e a ressurreição da proveniência: o contexto arquivístico no espaço e no tempo. Informação Arquivística, Rio de Janeiro, v. 4, n. 1, p. 144-162, jan./jun. 2015.
MINAYO, Maria Cecília de Souza (org.) et al. Pesquisa social: teoria, método e criatividade. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2004.
PROCHASSON, Christophe. Atenção: verdade! Arquivos privados e renovação das práticas historiográficas. Revista Estudos Históricos. Rio de Janeiro, FGV, v. 11, n. 21, 1998.
SANTOS, Paulo Roberto Elian. Arquivos de cientistas: gênese documental e procedimentos de organização. São Paulo: Associação dos Arquivistas de São Paulo, 2012.
THOMSON, Alistair. Recompondo a memória: questões sobre a relação entre história oral e as memórias. Projeto História. São Paulo, n. 15, p. 51-84, 1997.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which allows sharing the work with recognition of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
The author declares to be responsible for the originality, uniqueness and currency of the article content, by means of complete references to all consulted sources.
Each author grants to the LexCult Journal permission to evaluate, normalize, edit and publish the submitted article, in an unprecedented way.
Plagiarism cases and self plagiarism will not be accepted under no circumstances. The plagiarist will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years.
The copy, in full or to some extent, of an article published in LexCult Journal will be allowed as long as the source (author and Journal) is informed, being forbidden the commercial use and the production and distribution of derivative works. In case the exclusivity clause is broken, the submission will be filed and the author will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years, without bringing any civil actions provided by national law.
The author is aware that:
a) Submissions may be rejected if the journal's Editorial Board, responsible for evaluation and article selection, does not consider it pertinent for publication, whatever may be the well-justified reasons;
b) Editors reserve the right to modify the submitted manuscript - without any content alteration - in view of its normalization and adaptation to the publication norms.
